Indexé dans
- Base de données des revues académiques
- Ouvrir la porte J
- Genamics JournalSeek
- Clés académiques
- JournalTOCs
- Infrastructure nationale des connaissances en Chine (CNKI)
- CiteFactor
- Scimago
- Répertoire des périodiques d'Ulrich
- Bibliothèque des revues électroniques
- RechercheRef
- Université Hamdard
- EBSCO AZ
- OCLC - WorldCat
- Catalogue en ligne SWB
- Bibliothèque virtuelle de biologie (vifabio)
- Publions
- MIAR
- Commission des bourses universitaires
- Fondation genevoise pour la formation et la recherche médicales
- Pub européen
- Google Scholar
Liens utiles
Partager cette page
Dépliant de journal
Revues en libre accès
- Agriculture et aquaculture
- Alimentation et nutrition
- Biochimie
- Bioinformatique et biologie des systèmes
- Business & Management
- Chimie
- Génétique et biologie moléculaire
- Immunologie & Microbiologie
- Ingénierie
- La science des matériaux
- Neurosciences & Psychologie
- Science générale
- Sciences cliniques
- Sciences environnementales
- Sciences médicales
- Sciences pharmaceutiques
- Sciences vétérinaires
- Soins infirmiers et soins de santé
Abstrait
Bioequivalence Study of Quetiapine 25 mg Tablets in Healthy Thai Volunteers under Fasting Conditions
Ekawan Yoosakul, Vipada Khaowroongrueng, Jaturavit Vattanarongkup, Charinthon Seeduang, Nava Suthepakul, Busarat Karachot, Isariya Techatanawat, Praphassorn Surawattanawan, Porranee Puranajoti
A comparative randomized, single-dose, two-way crossover, open-label study was carried out to assess bioequivalence and tolerability of test (Quapine®) and reference (Seroquel®) products of quetiapine 25 mg tablets in healthy Thai volunteers. Forty-four male and female subjects were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected at predefined time points over 48 hours after oral administration. Plasma concentrations of quetiapine were determined using a validated Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for the test and reference products using non-compartmental analysis. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for the geometric least squares mean ratio of log-transformed primary parameters (AUC0-tlast, AUC0-∞ and Cmax) between the test and reference products. The 90% CIs were 96.08%-108.33% for AUC0-tlast, 96.21%-108.31% for AUC0-∞ and 96.52%-121.09% for Cmax which were within the bioequivalence criteria of 80.00%-125.00%. The analysis of variance did not show any significant difference between the two formulations. Both formulations were generally well tolerated in Thai subjects. The incidence of adverse events after receiving the test and reference products was similar. Therefore, they can be used interchangeably, and the same efficacy and safety can be anticipated.