Indexé dans
- Ouvrir la porte J
- Clés académiques
- RechercheRef
- Université Hamdard
- EBSCO AZ
- Publions
- Fondation genevoise pour la formation et la recherche médicales
- Google Scholar
Liens utiles
Partager cette page
Dépliant de journal
Revues en libre accès
- Agriculture et aquaculture
- Alimentation et nutrition
- Biochimie
- Bioinformatique et biologie des systèmes
- Business & Management
- Chimie
- Génétique et biologie moléculaire
- Immunologie & Microbiologie
- Ingénierie
- La science des matériaux
- Neurosciences & Psychologie
- Science générale
- Sciences cliniques
- Sciences environnementales
- Sciences médicales
- Sciences pharmaceutiques
- Sciences vétérinaires
- Soins infirmiers et soins de santé
Abstrait
Higher or lower tidal volume – An eternal dilemma
Anupam Gupta
Preterm infants often require mechanical ventilation. Volume targeted ventilation has been shown to reduce both complications and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Recommended tidal volumes vary from 4-8 mL/kg, but the optimal tidavolume remains elusive.
To compare a lower (4-5 mL/kg) to a higher (7-8 mL/kg) tidal volume during volume guarantee ventilation (VG) of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in very preterm infants.
The randomized trial was conducted at North Tees Hospital from 2013-2016. Babies <32 weeks’ gestation or <1500 grams birth weight and requiring mechanical ventilation within 12 hours of life from RDS were included in the study. Babies were randomized to receive lower (4-5 mL/kg) or higher (7-8 mL/kg) tidal volume using VG. The dead space was kept consistent by using standardized trimming of the ET tube. Subjects all received surfactant and were managed by a strict protocol with rescue by high frequency ventilation for defined criteria. The primary outcome was the time to achieve a 25% reduction from the initial peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Secondary outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation, as well as respiratory and non-respiratory complications. The data were analysed using SPSS® version 20.0..
During the study period, 70 of 97 (72%) eligible infants were enrolled. The groups were similar. The primary outcome, time to reduce PIP (median [IQR]) were 13.6 (8.8 – 25.2) hours and 17.4 (7.7 – 27.8) hours, respectively, for higher and lower Vt (p=0.678). The total duration of ventilation (median [IQR]) on higher vs lower tidal volume was 33.3 (22-368.8) and 61.8 (15.4-177.5) hours, respectively (p=0.959). There were no differences between the two groups for respiratory and non-respiratory complications of prematurity.
This study failed to find differences in lower versus higher tidal volume delivery in a small population of infants with RDS. It is possible that both tidal volume ranges selected for study are at functional residual capacity.