Journal de socialomique

Abstrait

Insightful Details on How Everything Developed From Nothing

Austin Murphy

In order to provide true knowledge, explanatory concepts in the social realm must be consistent with scientific observations on the micro-level substances that underlie the reality of the beings whose interactions social theories seek to explain. As a result, there is a need in social research for a unified theory of the basic physics of social beings that involves the nature of being itself. As pointed out by Omnes , a unified, consistent theory of being that reflects the reality of quantum physics is very important in ontology and philosophy in general. However, deep philosophical issues relating to whether social beings represent mere illusions and whether perceptions of such beings are detailed symbolic categorizations of the nature of existence or rough generalizations of the true state of everything are important in all A major contribution to ensuring such consistency has been provided by Leuten , who, using a very diverse cross-section of scientific evidence stemming from over a thousand interdisciplinary sources, explained how everything is composed of various combinations of divided nothingness that evolved from nothing. (Other authors such as Krauss, who explained how quantum gravity and cosmic inflation enable a universe with no net energy to last longer than virtual particles springing out of a vacuum, have suggested that the universe evolved from nothing, but they leave far larger gaps in developing theories or hypotheses on the details of how such a universe could have arisen endogenously from nothing. The origin of the observed laws of quantum mechanics and all the exotic particles in existence isn’t clarified in any way that is much different than assuming a deity appeared out of nothing and created quantum physics as well as everything else.