Indexé dans
  • Base de données des revues académiques
  • Ouvrir la porte J
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Clés académiques
  • JournalTOCs
  • Infrastructure nationale des connaissances en Chine (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Répertoire des périodiques d'Ulrich
  • Bibliothèque des revues électroniques
  • RechercheRef
  • Université Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC - WorldCat
  • Catalogue en ligne SWB
  • Bibliothèque virtuelle de biologie (vifabio)
  • Publions
  • MIAR
  • Commission des bourses universitaires
  • Fondation genevoise pour la formation et la recherche médicales
  • Pub européen
  • Google Scholar
Partager cette page
Dépliant de journal
Flyer image

Abstrait

Nontraditional Study Designs for Proving Bioequivalence

Sneha Latha

From past many years, concerns have been expressed regarding meeting the standard bioequivalence (BE) criteria for highly variable drugs. This has been point of discussion in many conferences and meetings. But to date there is no as such regulatory definition for these drugs or drug products. To pass conventional goal posts for these drugs, the number of subjects required for a study can be much higher than normally needed for a typical BE study. The resources required and the ethical concerns of exposing large number of healthy volunteers to a test drug further poses challenge to the suitability of conventional BE criteria (with an 80-125% acceptance range) for highly variable drugs. Examples exist where a highly variable reference product failed to demonstrate BE when compared to itself in a bioequivalent study using the standard design/sample size.